ReviewCancers2024
Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer in 2024.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using an interpretable machine learning approach based on multi-domain clinical features.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Potential of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-Based Lymph Node Classification in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a pretreatment DCE-MRI-based radiomics prediction model for axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy in node-positive breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Surgery: Past, Present and Future-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological factors associated with sentinel lymph node positivity in breast cancer using indocyanine green: a retrospective study in Peru.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Oncologic safety of breast-conserving surgery in node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- It Is Not an Obituary of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy or Surgery to Axilla, It's a De-Escalation of Surgery to Axilla in Early Breast Cancer: A Traditional Review.European journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Axillary Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy in cN1-2 Breast Cancer: An Internally Validated PET/CT-Integrated Nomogram.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Oncological Outcomes of De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients at a Referral Cancer Center in Colombia.Cancers · 2025Article
- Is There a Therapeutic Benefit of Axillary Surgery in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer? A SEER Cohort Database Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer with nodal micrometastases.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Development of a preoperative nomogram to identify low-risk early-stage breast cancer patients eligible for SLNB omission.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer-Towards De-escalation.Balkan medical journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Bridging Global Disparities in Breast Cancer Care: External Validation Study of the MD Anderson "Nomogram To Predict Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy" and Its Financial Implications of Axillary De-escalation in a Resource Limited Setting.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer (BC) in 2024 is becoming increasingly specific, moving away from the previous 'one size fits all' radical approach. The goal is to spare morbidity whilst maintaining oncologic safety. In the upfront surgery setting, a first landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the omission of any surgical axillary staging in patients with unremarkable clinical examination and axillary ultrasound showed non-inferiority to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB). The study population consisted of 87.8% postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC. Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer and up to two positive SLNs can safely be spared axillary dissection (ALND) even in the context of mastectomy or extranodal extension. In patients enrolled in the TAXIS trial, adjuvant systemic treatment was shown to be similar with or without ALND despite the loss of staging information. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), targeted lymph node removal with or without SLNB showed a lower false-negative rate to determine nodal pathological complete response (pCR) compared to SLNB alone. However, oncologic outcomes do not appear to differ in patients with nodal pCR determined by either one of the two concepts, according to a recently published global, retrospective, real-world study. Real-world studies generally have a lower level of evidence than RCTs, but they are feasible quickly and with a large sample size. Another global real-world study provides evidence that even patients with residual isolated tumor cells can be safely spared from ALND. In general, few indications for ALND remain. Three randomized controlled trials are ongoing for patients with clinically node-positive BC in the upfront surgery setting and residual disease after NACT. Pending the results of these trials, ALND remains indicated in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.