Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730501›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024

Electronic prescription systems in Greece: a large-scale survey of healthcare professionals' perceptions.

Margarita Grammatikopoulou, Ioulietta Lazarou, George Giannios, Christina Asimina Kakalou, Martha Zachariadou, Maria Zande, Haralampos Karanikas, Eleftherios Thireos, Thanos G Stavropoulos, Pantelis Natsiavas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Margarita GrammatikopoulouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece. marggram@iti.gr.
Ioulietta LazarouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
George GianniosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christina Asimina KakalouInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Martha ZachariadouErgobyte SA, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria ZandeErgobyte SA, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Haralampos KaranikasDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Eleftherios ThireosDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Thanos G StavropoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Pantelis NatsiavasInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Spiros NikolopoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis KompatsiarisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

Greek National funds project code:Τ2EDK-00640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe national e-prescription system in Greece is one of the most important achievements in the e-health sector. Healthcare professionals' feedback is essential to ensure the introduced system tends to their needs and reduces their everyday workload. The number of surveys collecting the users' views is limited, while the existing studies include only a small number of participants.

methodsIn this study, healthcare professionals' perceptions on e-prescription are explored. For this, a questionnaire was distributed online, containing closed- and open-ended questions aiming to address strengths and identify drawbacks in e-prescription. Answers were collected from primary health care physicians, specialized medical doctors and pharmacists.

resultsIn total, 430 answers were collected (129 from primary health care physicians, 164 responses from specialized medical doctors and 137 pharmacists). Analysis of the collected answers reveals that the views of the three groups of healthcare professionals mostly converge. The positive impact e-prescribing systems have on the overall prescribing procedure in preventing errors and providing automation is commented. Among gaps identified and proposed improvements, health care professionals note the need for access to information on adverse drug reactions, side effects, drug-to-drug interactions and allergies. Flexible interaction with Therapeutic Prescription Protocols is desired to ameliorate monitoring and decision-making, while drug dosing features, and simplified procedures for copying, repeating, canceling a prescription, are perceived as useful to incorporate.

conclusionsCollecting healthcare professionals' feedback is important, as their views can be transcribed to system requirements, to further promote e-prescribing and improve the provided health care services by facilitating decision making through safer and more efficient e-prescription. Introduction of the identified improvements can simplify the everyday workflow of healthcare professionals. To the best of our knowledge, a survey with more than 400 answered questionnaires on the use of e-prescription systems by healthcare professionals has never been conducted in Greece before.

Indexed as

Electronic prescribingElectronic prescription systemEnd-user requirementsHealthcare professionalsHealthcare systemsSurveySystem evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38730501
PMCPMC11088065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.