Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730479›Full record

ReviewEye and vision (London, England)2024

Multi-modal imaging for the detection of early keratoconus: a narrative review.

Muawyah Al Bdour, Hashem M Sabbagh, Hisham M Jammal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye and vision (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Corneal Diagnostics Using Machine Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  12. Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muawyah Al BdourDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-9047
Hashem M SabbaghThe National Center for Diabetes Endocrinology and Genetics (NCDEG), Amman, Jordan.
Hisham M JammalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, PO Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. hmjammal@just.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-7224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus is a common progressive corneal disorder that can be associated with significant ocular morbidity. Various corneal imaging techniques have been used for the diagnosis of established cases. However, in the early stages of the disease, which include subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus, detection of such cases can be challenging. The importance of detecting such cases is very important because early intervention can halt disease progression, improve visual outcomes and prevent postrefractive surgery ectasia associated with performing corneal refractive procedures in such patients. This narrative review aimed to examine several established and evolving imaging techniques for the detection of early cases of keratoconus. The utilization of combinations of these techniques may further increase their diagnostic ability.

Indexed as

EarlyForme frusteImagingKeratoconusMultimodalSubclinicalSuspect

Identifiers

PMID38730479
PMCPMC11088107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.