Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730447›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

"So we brought these players together": a qualitative study of educators' experiences to analyze the challenges of creating an e-learning program for neuropalliative care.

Julia Bu, Susan DeSanto-Madeya, Mara Lugassy, Jessica Besbris, Sarah Bublitz, Neha M Kramer, Roop Gursahani, Winnie Lau, Estella Kim, John Y Rhee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A 360 Degree Qualitative Ethical Assessment of Reporting Patient Reported Outcomes.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia BuUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. j1bu@health.ucsd.edu.
Susan DeSanto-MadeyaCollege of nursing, University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island, USA.
Mara LugassyWestchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Jessica BesbrisCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sarah BublitzInstitute of Palliative Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-543X
Neha M KramerRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Roop GursahaniP. D. Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6092-1595
Winnie LauUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Estella KimUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
John Y RheeDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Piret PaalDepartment of Ethnology, Institute of Cultural Studies, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-3248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the subspecialty of neuropalliative care has emerged with the goal of improving the quality of life of patients suffering from neurological disease, though gaps remain in neuropalliative care education and training. E-learning has been described as a way to deliver interactive and facilitated lower-cost learning to address global gaps in medical care. We describe here the development of a novel, international, hybrid, and asynchronous curriculum with both self-paced modules and class-based lectures on neuropalliative care topics designed for the neurologist interested in palliative care, the palliative care physician interested in caring for neurological patients, and any other physician or advanced care providers interested in neuropalliative care.

methodsThe course consisted of 12 modules, one per every four weeks, beginning July 2022. Each module is based on a case and relevant topics. Course content was divided into three streams (Neurology Basics, Palliative Care Basics, and Neuropalliative Care Essentials) of which two were optional and one was mandatory, and consisted of classroom sessions, webinars, and an in-person skills session. Evaluation of learners consisted of multiple choice questions and written assignments for each module. Evaluation of the course was based on semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with both educator and learner, the latter of which will be published separately. Audio files were transcribed and underwent thematic analysis. For the discussion of the results, Khan's e-learning framework was used.

resultsTen of the 12 participating educators were interviewed. Of the educators, three identified as mid-career and seven as senior faculty, ranging from six to 33 years of experience. Nine of ten reported an academic affiliation and all reported association with a teaching hospital. Themes identified from the educators' evaluations were: bridging the global gap, getting everybody on board, defining the educational scope, investing extensive hours of voluntary time and resources, benefiting within and beyond the curriculum, understanding the learner's experience, creating a community of shared learning, adapting future teaching and learning strategies, and envisioning long term sustainability.

conclusionsThe first year of a novel, international, hybrid, and asynchronous neuropalliative care curriculum has been completed, and its educators have described both successes and avenues for improvement. Further research is planned to assess this curriculum from the learner perspective.

Indexed as

CurriculumPalliative CareQualitative ResearchComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceHumansNeurologyNeuropalliative education e-learning

Identifiers

PMID38730447
PMCPMC11088003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.