Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730312›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024

Optimal trade-off between boosted tolerance and growth fitness during adaptive evolution of yeast to ethanol shocks.

Ana Paula Jacobus, Stella Diogo Cavassana, Isabelle Inácio de Oliveira, Joneclei Alves Barreto, Ewerton Rohwedder, Jeverson Frazzon, Thalita Peixoto Basso, Luiz Carlos Basso, Jeferson Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mutagenesis and Analysis for Enhancing (2Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Paula JacobusBioenergy Research Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.
Stella Diogo CavassanaBioenergy Research Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.
Isabelle Inácio de OliveiraBioenergy Research Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.
Joneclei Alves BarretoBioenergy Research Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.
Ewerton RohwedderBiological Science Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Jeverson FrazzonInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Thalita Peixoto BassoDepartment of Agri-Food Industry, Food and Nutrition, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos BassoBiological Science Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Jeferson GrossBioenergy Research Institute, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil. jeferson.gross@unesp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 13/15743-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 17/13972-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 17/24453-5 to APJ.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 23/04162-7 to JG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with higher alcohol tolerance can potentially increase the industrial production of ethanol fuel. However, the design of selection protocols to obtain bioethanol yeasts with higher alcohol tolerance poses the challenge of improving industrial strains that are already robust to high ethanol levels. Furthermore, yeasts subjected to mutagenesis and selection, or laboratory evolution, often present adaptation trade-offs wherein higher stress tolerance is attained at the expense of growth and fermentation performance. Although these undesirable side effects are often associated with acute selection regimes, the utility of using harsh ethanol treatments to obtain robust ethanologenic yeasts still has not been fully investigated.

resultsWe conducted an adaptive laboratory evolution by challenging four populations (P1-P4) of the Brazilian bioethanol yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2_H4, through 68-82 cycles of 2-h ethanol shocks (19-30% v/v) and outgrowths. Colonies isolated from the final evolved populations (P1c-P4c) were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, revealing mutations in genes enriched for the cAMP/PKA and trehalose degradation pathways. Fitness analyses of the isolated clones P1c-P3c and reverse-engineered strains demonstrated that mutations were primarily selected for cell viability under ethanol stress, at the cost of decreased growth rates in cultures with or without ethanol. Under this selection regime for stress survival, the population P4 evolved a protective snowflake phenotype resulting from BUD3 disruption. Despite marked adaptation trade-offs, the combination of reverse-engineered mutations cyr1

conclusionsOur study combined genomic, mutational, and fitness analyses to understand the genetic underpinnings of yeast evolution to ethanol shocks. Although fitness analyses revealed that most evolved mutations impose a cost for cell propagation, combination of key mutations cyr1

Indexed as

Adaptive laboratory evolutionAlcoholic fermentationBioethanol yeastscAMP/PKA pathwayCRISPR/Cas9Ethanol toleranceSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID38730312
PMCPMC11088041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.