Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Breast cancer diagnosis using support vector machine optimized by improved quantum inspired grey wolf optimization.

Anas Bilal, Azhar Imran, Talha Imtiaz Baig, Xiaowen Liu, Emad Abouel Nasr, Haixia Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anas BilalCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China.
Azhar ImranDepartment of Creative Technologies, Air University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Talha Imtiaz BaigSchool of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China UESTC, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaowen LiuCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China.
Emad Abouel NasrIndustrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, 11421, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haixia LongCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China. myresearch_hainnu@163.com.

Funding

Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No.621RC1059, 621MS038, 823RC488, 724RC510, 721QN0890)King Saud University Researchers Supporting Program RSP2024R164National Natural Science Foundation of China 62262019The Education Department of Hainan Province of China No. Hnky2021-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prompt diagnosis of breast cancer in its earliest phases is necessary for effective treatment. While Computer-Aided Diagnosis systems play a crucial role in automated mammography image processing, interpretation, grading, and early detection of breast cancer, existing approaches face limitations in achieving optimal accuracy. This study addresses these limitations by hybridizing the improved quantum-inspired binary Grey Wolf Optimizer with the Support Vector Machines Radial Basis Function Kernel. This hybrid approach aims to enhance the accuracy of breast cancer classification by determining the optimal Support Vector Machine parameters. The motivation for this hybridization lies in the need for improved classification performance compared to existing optimizers such as Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm. Evaluate the efficacy of the proposed IQI-BGWO-SVM approach on the MIAS dataset, considering various metric parameters, including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, the application of IQI-BGWO-SVM for feature selection will be explored, and the results will be compared. Experimental findings demonstrate that the suggested IQI-BGWO-SVM technique outperforms state-of-the-art classification methods on the MIAS dataset, with a resulting mean accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 99.25%, 98.96%, and 100%, respectively, using a tenfold cross-validation datasets partition.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMammographyBreast cancerGrey wolf optimizationMedical image analysisQuantum computingSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID38730250
PMCPMC11087531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.