Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38730132›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2024

Meiosis through three centuries.

Gareth Jones, Nancy Kleckner, Denise Zickler

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Active maintenance of meiosis-specific chromosome structures inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Non-uniform chromosomal SNP density biases sites of meiotic crossovers inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Active maintenance of meiosis-specific chromosome structures inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gareth JonesSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Nancy KlecknerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. kleckner@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4854-3210
Denise ZicklerInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

Chromosome organization and function in time and space: meiosis, mitosis and E. coliR35GM136322 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Nancy E Kleckner · 2020 to 2026
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiosis is the specialized cellular program that underlies gamete formation for sexual reproduction. It is therefore not only interesting but also a fundamentally important subject for investigation. An especially attractive feature of this program is that many of the processes of special interest involve organized chromosomes, thus providing the possibility to see chromosomes "in action". Analysis of meiosis has also proven to be useful in discovering and understanding processes that are universal to all chromosomal programs. Here we provide an overview of the different historical moments when the gap between observation and understanding of mechanisms and/or roles for the new discovered molecules was bridged. This review reflects also the synergy of thinking and discussion among our three laboratories during the past several decades.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsChromosomesHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansCrossing overEvolutionMeiosisPairingSynaptonemal complex

Identifiers

PMID38730132
PMCPMC11180163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.