ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024
The performance of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) and DWI-MRI in staging patients with cervical carcinoma according to the new FIGO classification (2018).
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of node-RADS for the detection of lymph node invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Combining Node-RADS with ADC can improve diagnostic performance for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable MRI-based multimodal fusion model for predicting lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Node-RADS for preoperative assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma: validation and modification.European radiology · 2026Article
- MRI Dark-Light-Dark Sign and Node Reporting Score: An Integrated Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Node-RADS for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Node-RADS in cervical cancer: a multi-reader agreement and diagnostic performance study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Multireader diagnostic performance of MRI-based Node-RADS for pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of Node-RADS scoring in stage IIICr cervical cancer: development and validation of novel nomograms.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Node-RADS for preoperative locoregional nodal staging of endometrial cancer: reproducibility and accuracy assessment using CT and MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- RADS ALPHABET: news and tips for young and general radiologists.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Standardizing cervical lymph node evaluation in papillary thyroid carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of Node-RADS on ultrasound.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Retrospective Study of Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes in 305 Surgically Treated Patients with Stage IB-IIA Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Anatomy, Imaging, and Surgical Treatment of Thoracic Lymphadenopathies in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Node-RADS score and the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) involvement in cervical cancer (CC) patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The applicability of the Node RADS score across three readers with different years of experience in pelvic imaging was also assessed. MATERIAL AND
methodsAmong 140 patients, 68 underwent staging MRI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery, forming the study cohort. Node-RADS scores of the main pelvic stations were retrospectively determined to assess LN metastatic likelihood and compared with the histological findings. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of LNs classified as Node-RADS ≥ 3 were measured and compared with histological reports, considered as gold standard.
resultsSensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), and accuracy were calculated for different Node-RADS thresholds. Node RADS ≥ 3 showed a sensitivity of 92.8% and specificity of 72.5%. Node RADS ≥ 4 yielded a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 100%, while Node RADS 5 yielded 42.9% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of mean ADC, cADC and rADC values from 78 LNs with Node-RADS score ≥ 3 was assessed, with ADC demonstrating the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.820), compared to cADC and rADC values.
conclusionThe Node-RADS score provides a standardized LNs assessment, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in CC patients. Its ease of use and high inter-observer concordance support its clinical utility. ADC measurement of LNs shows promise as an additional tool for optimizing patient diagnostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.