ReviewJournal of human genetics2024
Fundamentals for predicting transcriptional regulations from DNA sequence patterns.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- iEnhancer-GDM: A Deep Learning Framework Based on Generative Adversarial Network and Multi-head Attention Mechanism to Identify Enhancers and Their Strength.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Designing interpretable deep learning applications for functional genomics: a quantitative analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-type-specific regulatory elements, cataloged through extensive experiments and bioinformatics in large-scale consortiums, have enabled enrichment analyses of genetic associations that primarily utilize positional information of the regulatory elements. These analyses have identified cell types and pathways genetically associated with human complex traits. However, our understanding of detailed allelic effects on these elements' activities and on-off states remains incomplete, hampering the interpretation of human genetic study results. This review introduces machine learning methods to learn sequence-dependent transcriptional regulation mechanisms from DNA sequences for predicting such allelic effects (not associations). We provide a concise history of machine-learning-based approaches, the requirements, and the key computational processes, focusing on primers in machine learning. Convolution and self-attention, pivotal in modern deep-learning models, are explained through geometrical interpretations using dot products. This facilitates understanding of the concept and why these have been used for machine learning for DNA sequences. These will inspire further research in this genetics and genomics field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.