Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38729994›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

ROSPaCe: Intrusion Detection Dataset for a ROS2-Based Cyber-Physical System and IoT Networks.

Tommaso Puccetti, Simone Nardi, Cosimo Cinquilli, Tommaso Zoppi, Andrea Ceccarelli

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tommaso PuccettiDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 67/a, 50134, Firenze, FI, Italy. tommaso.puccetti@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-2108
Simone NardiMermec Engineering, Via Livornese 1019, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
Cosimo CinquilliDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 67/a, 50134, Firenze, FI, Italy.
Tommaso ZoppiDepartment of Engineering and Information Science, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38124, Trento, Italy.
Andrea CeccarelliDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 67/a, 50134, Firenze, FI, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) B53D23012930006Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) PE00000014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the intrusion detection datasets to research machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are devoted to cyber-only systems, and they typically collect data from one architectural layer. Often the attacks are generated in dedicated attack sessions, without reproducing the realistic alternation and overlap of normal and attack actions. We present a dataset for intrusion detection by performing penetration testing on an embedded cyber-physical system built over Robot Operating System 2 (ROS2). Features are monitored from three architectural layers: the Linux operating system, the network, and the ROS2 services. The dataset is structured as a time series and describes the expected behavior of the system and its response to ROS2-specific attacks: it repeatedly alternates periods of attack-free operation with periods when a specific attack is being performed. This allows measuring the time to detect an attacker and the number of malicious activities performed before detection. Also, it allows training an intrusion detector to minimize both, by taking advantage of the numerous alternating periods of normal and attack operations.

Identifiers

PMID38729994
PMCPMC11087584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.