Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38729961›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment.

Beau Sievers, Christopher Welker, Uri Hasson, Adam M Kleinbaum, Thalia Wheatley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Layers of Social Meaning: Innate, Acquired, and Deliberative Levels of Referential Signal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural predictors of hidden, persistent psychological states at work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Synchrony Across Brains.Annual review of psychology · 2025
    Review
  17. Self-views converge during enjoyable conversations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Interpersonal heart rate synchrony predicts effective information processing in a naturalistic group decision-making task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The Emerging Science of Interacting Minds.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beau SieversDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. beau@beausievers.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-7479
Christopher WelkerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9833-8338
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-7168
Adam M KleinbaumTuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-2154
Thalia WheatleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.

Funding

Brain-to-brain dynamical Coupling: A New framework for the communication of social knowledgeR01MH112566 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI, WHEATLEY, THALIA P · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112566U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH112566-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversation is a primary means of social influence, but its effects on brain activity remain unknown. Previous work on conversation and social influence has emphasized public compliance, largely setting private beliefs aside. Here, we show that consensus-building conversation aligns future brain activity within groups, with alignment persisting through novel experiences participants did not discuss. Participants watched ambiguous movie clips during fMRI scanning, then conversed in groups with the goal of coming to a consensus about each clip's narrative. After conversation, participants' brains were scanned while viewing the clips again, along with novel clips from the same movies. Groups that reached consensus showed greater similarity of brain activity after conversation. Participants perceived as having high social status spoke more and signaled disbelief in others, and their groups had unequal turn-taking and lower neural alignment. By contrast, participants with central positions in their real-world social networks encouraged others to speak, facilitating greater group neural alignment. Socially central participants were also more likely to become neurally aligned to others in their groups.

Indexed as

BrainConsensusMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultBrain MappingCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38729961
PMCPMC11087652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.