Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38729756›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Study protocol for two randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of Cerclage in the reduction of extreme preterm birth and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies with a short cervix or dilatation: the TWIN Cerclage studies.

Lissa van Gils, Marjon A de Boer, Judith Bosmans, Ruben Duijnhoven, Sam Schoenmakers, Jan B Derks, Jelmer R Prins, Salwan Al-Nasiry, Margo Lutke Holzik, Enrico Lopriore and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968794 (The Effectiveness of Cerclage for the Reduction of Extreme Preterm Birth and Perinatal Mortality in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix or Dilatation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968794 narecruitingnot on this map

The Effectiveness of Cerclage for the Reduction of Extreme Preterm Birth and Perinatal Mortality in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix or Dilatation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2023 to 2028Enrolled238ConditionsPreterm BirthArmsVaginal cerclage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Lissa van GilsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands L.vangils1@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1828-2221
Marjon A de BoerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Ruben DuijnhovenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sam SchoenmakersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan B DerksDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelmer R PrinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3984-2163
Salwan Al-NasiryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Margo Lutke HolzikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Enrico LoprioreDepartment of Neonatology and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joris van DrongelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke H KnolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Judith O E H van LaarDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Yves JacquemynUniversity Hospital Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Caroline van HolsbekeAZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Isabelle DehaeneUniversity Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-6946
Liesbeth LewiFetal Medicine Unit, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Hannes van der MerweFetal Medicine Unit, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Wilfried GyselaersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Sylvia A Obermann-BorstCare4Neo, Neonatal patient and parent advocacy organization, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mayella HolthuisPatient organization 'Extreme Vroeggeboorte', Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben W Moldepartment of obstetrics and gynaecology, school of medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-550X
Eva PajkrtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8672-4365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwin pregnancies have a high risk of extreme preterm birth (PTB) at less than 28 weeks of gestation, which is associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Currently there is a lack of effective treatments for women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix or cervical dilatation. A possible effective surgical method to reduce extreme PTB in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix or dilatation at midpregnancy is the placement of a vaginal cerclage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed two multicentre randomised trials involving eight hospitals in the Netherlands (sites in other countries may be added at a later date). Women older than 16 years with a twin pregnancy at <24 weeks of gestation and an asymptomatic short cervix of ≤25 mm or cervical dilatation will be randomly allocated (1:1) to both trials on vaginal cerclage and standard treatment according to the current Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology guideline (no cerclage). Permuted blocks sized 2 and 4 will be used to minimise the risk of disbalance. The primary outcome measure is PTB of <28 weeks. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The first trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 25% to 10% in the short cervix group, for which 194 patients need to be recruited. The second trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 80% to 35% in the dilatation group and will recruit 44 women. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands on 3/30/2023. Participants will be required to sign an informed consent form. The results will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants will be informed about the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05968794.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPerinatal MortalityPregnancy, TwinPremature BirthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultCervix UteriFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPregnancyfetal medicinematernal medicineobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID38729756
PMCPMC11097875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.