Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38729243›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2024

A New Angle on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil Orientation: A Targeted Narrative Review.

Andris Cerins, Elizabeth H X Thomas, Tracy Barbour, Joseph J Taylor, Shan H Siddiqi, Nicholas Trapp, Alexander McGirr, Kevin A Caulfield, Joshua C Brown, Leo Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multi-coil TMS for preclinical applications in ultra-high-field MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andris CerinsDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: andris.cerins@monash.edu.
Elizabeth H X ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tracy BarbourMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph J TaylorCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shan H SiddiqiCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicholas TrappUniversity of Iowa, Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, Iowa City, Iowa.
Alexander McGirrDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kevin A CaulfieldBrain Stimulation Division, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Joshua C BrownBrain Stimulation Mechanisms Laboratory, Division of Depression and Anxiety Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leo ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Alfred Mental and Addiction Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Using human brain connectivity to identify the causal neuroanatomical substrate of depression symptomsR01MH113929 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MICHAEL D FOX · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Personalized circuit-based neuromodulation targets for depressionK23MH121657 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SIDDIQI, SHAN · 2020 to 2024
$978k
Deriving TMS Targets for Mood Valence and Mood Stabilization in Bipolar DisorderK23MH129829 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Joseph Jeffrey Taylor · 2022 to 2026
$978k
Investigating Network Plasticity Effects of Repetitive Brain Stimulation Following Invasive and Noninvasive Methods in HumansK23MH125145 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TRAPP, NICHOLAS THOMAS · 2021 to 2025
$934k
Targeted modulation of symptom-specific brain circuits with transcranial magnetic stimulationR21MH126271 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FOX, MICHAEL D · 2021 to 2022
$492k
Ketamine for the treatment for alcohol use disorder in the emergency department: A pilot double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trialR21AA030372 · NIAAA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHAI, PETER R, SUZUKI, JOJI · 2022 to 2023
$470k
CSRD VA I01 CX002293NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA030372NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH121657NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH125145NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH129829NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113929NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH126271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately one half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, and target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy, which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. In this targeted narrative review, we evaluate experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationBrainHumansMotor CortexCurrent directionGyral anatomyrTMS coil orientationTMS targetingTMS treatmentTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38729243
PMCPMC12221855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.