Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38729158›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Medicine2024

Inhibition of protein translational machinery in triple-negative breast cancer as a promising therapeutic strategy.

Arpit Dheeraj, Fernando Jose Garcia Marques, Dhanir Tailor, Abel Bermudez, Angel Resendez, Mallesh Pandrala, Benedikt Grau, Praveen Kumar, Carrsyn B Haley, Alexander Honkala and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ribosome-directed cancer therapies: the tip of the iceberg?Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Triterpenes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. YB1 and its role in osteosarcoma: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arpit DheerajDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Fernando Jose Garcia MarquesDepartment of Radiology, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Dhanir TailorDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Abel BermudezDepartment of Radiology, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Angel ResendezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Mallesh PandralaDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Benedikt GrauDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Praveen KumarDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Carrsyn B HaleyCenter for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Alexander HonkalaDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Praveen KujurDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stefanie S JeffreyDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sharon PitteriDepartment of Radiology, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sanjay V MalhotraDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: malhotsa@ohsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) is a proto-oncogenic protein associated with protein translation regulation. It plays a crucial role in the development and progression of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we describe a promising approach to inhibit YB-1 using SU056, a small-molecule inhibitor. SU056 physically interacts with YB-1 and reduces its expression, which helps to restrain the progression of TNBC. Proteome profiling analysis indicates that the inhibition of YB-1 by SU056 can alter the proteins that regulate protein translation, an essential process for cancer cell growth. Preclinical studies on human cells, mice, and patient-derived xenograft tumor models show the effectiveness of SU056. Moreover, toxicological studies have shown that SU056 treatment and dosing are well tolerated without any adverse effects. Overall, our study provides a strong foundation for the further development of SU056 as a potential treatment option for patients with TNBC by targeting YB-1.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysY-Box-Binding Protein 1AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMice, NudeY-Box-Binding Protein 1YBX1 protein, humanCETSAeIFprotein translationproteosome profilingribosomesRPLRPSsmall moleculetriple-negative breast cancerYB-1

Identifiers

PMID38729158
PMCPMC11148772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.