Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38728624›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.

Yongfeng Liu, Jianping Kong, Gongyu Liu, Zhaoxing Li, Yibei Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. VersatileProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yongfeng LiuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4741-5066
Jianping KongDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-364X
Gongyu LiuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3700-0290
Zhaoxing LiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Yibei XiaoDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4716-5526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene knock-in refers to the insertion of exogenous functional genes into a target genome to achieve continuous expression. Currently, most knock-in tools are based on site-directed nucleases, which can induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the target, following which the designed donors carrying functional genes can be inserted via the endogenous gene repair pathway. The size of donor genes is limited by the characteristics of gene repair, and the DSBs induce risks like genotoxicity. New generation tools, such as prime editing, transposase, and integrase, can insert larger gene fragments while minimizing or eliminating the risk of DSBs, opening new avenues in the development of animal models and gene therapy. However, the elimination of off-target events and the production of delivery carriers with precise requirements remain challenging, restricting the application of the current knock-in treatments to mainly in vitro settings. Here, a comprehensive review of the knock-in tools that do not/minimally rely on DSBs and use other mechanisms is provided. Moreover, the challenges and recent advances of in vivo knock-in treatments in terms of the therapeutic process is discussed. Collectively, the new generation of DSBs-minimizing and large-fragment knock-in tools has revolutionized the field of gene editing, from basic research to clinical treatment.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGene Knock-In TechniquesGenetic TherapyAnimalsGene EditingHumansDSBsgene therapyknock inlarge fragment

Identifiers

PMID38728624
PMCPMC11267366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.