Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38728545›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives

You Cannot Function in "Overwhelm": Helping Primary Care Navigate the Slow End of the Pandemic.

Erin E Sullivan, Rebecca S Etz, Martha M Gonzalez, Jordyn Deubel, Sarah R Reves, Kurt C Stange, Lauren S Hughes, Mark Linzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin E SullivanSawyer School of Business at Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, and the Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca S Etz
Martha M GonzalezLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Jordyn DeubelSawyer School of Business at Suffolk University.
Sarah R RevesLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Kurt C StangeLarry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lauren S HughesEugene S. Farley, Jr. Health Policy Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Mark LinzerDepartment of Medicine and Institute for Professional Worklife, Hennepin Healthcare and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Novel, High-Impact Studies Evaluating Health System and Healthcare Professional Responsiveness to COVID-19R01HS028253 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ETZ, REBECCA SARAH · 2021 to 2022
$975k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalThis study was developed to explicate underlying organizational factors contributing to the deterioration of primary care clinicians' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsUsing data from the Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good's national survey of primary care clinicians from March 2020 to March 2022, a multidisciplinary team analyzed more than 11,150 open-ended comments. Phase 1 of the analysis happened in real-time as surveys were returned, using deductive and inductive coding. Phase 2 used grounded theory to identify emergent themes. Qualitative findings were triangulated with the survey's quantitative data. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe clinicians shifted from feelings of anxiety and uncertainty at the start of the pandemic to isolation, lack of fulfillment, moral injury, and plans to leave the profession. The frequency with which they spoke of depression, burnout, and moral injury was striking. The contributors to this distress included crushing workloads, worsening staff shortages, and insufficient reimbursement. Consequences, both felt and anticipated, included fatigue and demoralization from the inability to manage escalating workloads. Survey findings identified responses that could alleviate the mental health crisis, namely: (1) measuring and customizing workloads based on work capacity; (2) quantifying resources needed to return to sufficient staffing levels; (3) promoting state and federal support for sustainable practice infrastructures with less administrative burden; and (4) creating patient visits of different lengths to rebuild relationships and trust and facilitate more accurate diagnoses. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Attention to clinicians' mental health should be rapidly directed to on-demand, confidential mental health support so they can receive the care they need and not worry about any stigma or loss of license for accepting that help. Interventions that address work-life balance, workload, and resources can improve care, support retention of the critically important primary care workforce, and attract more trainees to primary care careers.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19PandemicsPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID38728545
PMCPMC12829454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.