Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38728277›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

"Endless opportunities": A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe.

Chelsea Elkins, Sandra Kokera, Phiona Vumbugwa, Jacqueline Gavhera, Kathleen M West, Katherine Wilson, Batsirai Makunike-Chikwinya, Lewis Masimba, Marrianne Holec, Scott Barnhart and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chelsea ElkinsDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Sandra KokeraZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Centre for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Phiona VumbugwaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jacqueline GavheraZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Centre for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kathleen M WestHealth Systems & Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Katherine WilsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Batsirai Makunike-ChikwinyaZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Centre for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lewis MasimbaZimbabwe Technical Training and Education Centre for Health (Zim-TTECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Marrianne HolecDepartment of Global Health, International Training and Education Center for Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Scott BarnhartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Sulemana MatinuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Beatrice WassunaMedic, Nairobi, Kenya.
Caryl FeldackerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8152-6754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Zimbabwe, the ZAZIC consortium employs two-way, text-based (2wT) follow-up to strengthen post-operative care for voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). 2wT scaled nationally with evidence of client support and strengthened follow-up. However, 2wT uptake among healthcare providers remains suboptimal. Understanding the gap between mobile health (mHealth) potential for innovation expansion and scale-up realization is critical for 2wT and other mHealth innovations. Therefore, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study with the objective of identifying 2wT program strengths, challenges, and suggestions for scale up as part of routine VMMC services. A total of 16 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with diverse 2wT stakeholders were conducted, including nurses, monitoring & evaluation teams, and technology partners-a combination of perspectives that provide new insights. We used both inductive and deductive coding for thematic analysis. Among 2wT drivers of expansion success, interviewees noted: 2wT care benefits for clients; effective hands-on 2wT training; ease of app use for providers; 2wT saved time and money; and 2wT strengthened client/provider interaction. For 2wT scale-up challenges, staff shortages; network infrastructure constraints; client costs; duplication of paper and electronic reporting; and complexity of digital tools integration. To improve 2wT robustness, respondents suggested: more staff training to offset turnover; making 2wT free for clients; using 2wT to replace paper VMMC reporting; integrating with routine VMMC reporting systems; and expanding 2wT to other health areas. High stakeholder participation in app design, implementation strengthening, and evaluation were appreciated. Several 2wT improvements stemmed from this study, including enrollment of multiple people on one number to account for phone sharing; 2wT inclusion of minors ages 15+; clients provided with $1 to offset SMS costs; and reduced SMS messages to clients. Continued 2wT mentoring for staff, harmonization of 2wT with Ministry e-health data systems, and increased awareness of 2wT's client and provider benefits will help ensure successful 2wT scale-up.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleQualitative ResearchText MessagingAdultFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansMaleTelemedicineZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID38728277
PMCPMC11086850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.