ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
Transcutaneous Discrimination of Fetal Heart Rate from Maternal Heart Rate: A Fetal Oximetry Proof-of-Concept.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FOSTER: A Comprehensive Pipeline for Transabdominal Fetal Pulse Oximetry Validated in a Large Animal Model of Pregnancy.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- HDFusion: Hierarchical Data Fusion for Robust Fetal Heart Rate Estimation using Transabdominal PPG Signals.ACM transactions on computing for healthcare · 2026Article
- Multi-layer self-calibrated algorithm for transabdominal fetal pulse oximetry: simulation andJPhys photonics · 2026Article
- Synthetic-data-driven LSTM framework for tracing cardiac pulsation in optical signals.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Sensitivity analysis of transabdominal fetal pulse oximetry using MRI-based simulations.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrapartum care uses electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFHRM) for over 50 years to indirectly assess fetal oxygenation. However, this approach has been associated with an increase in cesarean delivery rates and limited improvements in neonatal hypoxic outcome. To address these shortcomings, a novel transabdominal fetal pulse oximeter (TFO) is being developed to provide an objective measurement of fetal oxygenation. Previous studies have evaluated the performance of TFO on pregnant ewe. Building on the animal model, this study aims to determine whether TFO can successfully capture human fetal heart rate (FHR) signals during non-stress testing (NST) as a proof-of-concept. Eight ongoing pregnancies meeting specific inclusion criteria (18-40 years old, singleton, and at least 36 weeks' gestation) were enrolled with consent. Each study session was 15 to 20 min long. Reference maternal heart rate (MHR) and FHR were obtained using finger pulse oximetry and cardiotocography for subsequent comparison. The overall root-mean-square error was 9.7BPM for FHR and 4.4 for MHR, while the overall mean-absolute error was 7.6BPM for FHR and 1.8 for MHR. Bland-Altman analysis displayed a mean bias ± standard deviation between TFO and reference of -3.9 ± 8.9BPM, with limits of agreement ranging from -21.4 to 13.6 BPM. Both maternal and fetal heart rate measurements obtained from TFO exhibited a p-value < 0.001, showing significant correlation with the reference. This proof-of-concept study successfully demonstrates that TFO can accurately differentiate maternal and fetal heart signals in human subjects. This achievement marks the initial step towards enabling fetal oxygen saturation measurement in humans using TFO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.