Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727941›Full record

ArticleAmbio2024

A social-ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas.

Zheyi Xia, Jiasi Huang, Yuwen Huang, Kui Liu, Runmiao Zhu, Zhen Shen, Chengcheng Yuan, Liming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zheyi XiaCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jiasi HuangCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuwen HuangCenter for Historical Geographical Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Kui LiuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Runmiao ZhuCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhen ShenCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chengcheng YuanCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Liming LiuCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing, 100193, China. liulm@cau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8934-9000

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2021TC072National Natural Science Foundation of China 42001224National Natural Science Foundation of China 42071284National Natural Science Foundation of China 42271105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering both ecological and social dimensions in the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) can facilitate acceptable and inclusive management strategies, especially in peri-urban areas characterized by intricate human-ecosystem interactions. A limited body of research, however, has mapped the plural values of ESs and their different types of trade-offs in such areas. This research aimed to execute an interdisciplinary analysis of the biophysical and social values of ESs in peri-urban Shanghai, China, through a social-ecological approach that integrates spatial biophysical assessment with participatory mapping. Trade-off analysis in both ES types and ES valuations were then conducted, and multicriteria decision-making was applied for conservation. Our results reveal that trade-off intensities were lower within the social values compared to the biophysical values. Within both value dimensions, relatively stronger trade-offs were found between food production and other ESs. Areas with both high biophysical and social values were infrequently observed across ESs. Based on the characteristics of diverse values, our study identified priority conservation areas and provided management implications. We argue that adopting the integrated social-ecological perspective in sustainable environmental management contributes to the realization of harmonious coexistence between people and nature in peri-urban areas.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemChinaCitiesDecision MakingHumansSocial ValuesBiophysical assessmentIntegrated valuationParticipatory mappingPriority conservation areasSocial–ecological systemsSustainable environmental management

Identifiers

PMID38727941
PMCPMC11383913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.