Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727912›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Characterizing Functional Contributions of Specific GluN2 Subunits to Individual Postsynaptic NMDAR Responses Using Biophysical Parameters.

Annemarie Dedek, Michael E Hildebrand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annemarie DedekDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael E HildebrandDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Mike.Hildebrand@carleton.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NMDAR is a heterotetramer composed of two GluN1 subunits and two GluN2 and/or GluN3 subunits, with the GluN2 subunits exhibiting significant diversity in their structure and function. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of characterizing the specific roles of each GluN2 subunit across central nervous system regions and developmental stages, as well as their unique contributions to NMDAR-mediated signaling and plasticity. Understanding the distinct functions of GluN2 subunits is critical for the development of targeted therapeutic strategies for NMDAR-related disorders. However, measuring the functional contribution of individual GluN2 subtypes in ex vivo slices is challenging. Conventionally, pharmacological or genetic approaches are used, but, in many cases, this is not possible or is restricted to population-level NMDAR responses. Here, we describe a technique for using biophysical properties of miniature synaptic NMDAR responses as a proxy to measure the functional contribution of specific GluN2-NMDAR subunits to individual synapses within a neuron.

Indexed as

Protein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynapsesAnimalsMiceNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsSynaptic TransmissionProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAmplitudeBiophysical propertiesDecay constantElectrophysiologyGluN2mEPSCNMDAR subunitPatch clamp

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.