Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727905›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Behavioral Analysis of NMDAR Function in Rodents: Tests of Long-Term Spatial Memory.

David M Bannerman, Chris Barkus, Ahmed Eltokhi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M BannermanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.bannerman@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Chris BarkusDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ahmed EltokhiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Columbus, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDAR-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity in brain regions like the hippocampus are widely believed to provide the neural substrate for long-term associative memory formation. However, the experimental data are equivocal at best and may suggest a more nuanced role for NMDARs and synaptic plasticity in memory. Much of the experimental data available comes from studies in genetically modified mice in which NMDAR subunits have been deleted or mutated in order to disrupt NMDAR function. Behavioral assessment of long-term memory in these mice has involved tests like the Morris watermaze and the radial arm maze. Here we describe these behavioral tests and some of the different testing protocols that can be used to assess memory performance. We discuss the importance of distinguishing selective effects on learning and memory processes from nonspecific effects on sensorimotor or motivational aspects of performance.

Indexed as

Maze LearningMemory, Long-TermReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSpatial MemoryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHippocampusMiceNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateGenetically modified miceHippocampusMorris watermazeNMDA receptorsRadial arm mazeReversal learningSpatial reference memorySpatial working memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.