Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727841›Full record

ReviewHead and neck pathology2024

An Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Research.

Shahd A Alajaji, Zaid H Khoury, Maryam Jessri, James J Sciubba, Ahmed S Sultan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Predicting Malignant Transformation in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Systematic Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Risk Models and Pathologist-Based Microscopy.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahd A Alajaji *Department of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, 650 W. Baltimore Street, 7 Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Zaid H Khoury *Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences and Research, Meharry Medical College School of Dentistry, Nashville, TN, USA.
Maryam JessriOral Medicine and Pathology Department, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
James J SciubbaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ahmed S SultanDepartment of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, 650 W. Baltimore Street, 7 Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. asultan1@umaryland.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is a precancerous histopathological finding which is considered the most important prognostic indicator for determining the risk of malignant transformation into oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The gold standard for diagnosis and grading of OED is through histopathological examination, which is subject to inter- and intra-observer variability, impacting accurate diagnosis and prognosis. The aim of this review article is to examine the current advances in digital pathology for artificial intelligence (AI) applications used for OED diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included studies that used AI for diagnosis, grading, or prognosis of OED on histopathology images or intraoral clinical images. Studies utilizing imaging modalities other than routine light microscopy (e.g., scanning electron microscopy), or immunohistochemistry-stained histology slides, or immunofluorescence were excluded from the study. Studies not focusing on oral dysplasia grading and diagnosis, e.g., to discriminate OSCC from normal epithelial tissue were also excluded.

resultsA total of 24 studies were included in this review. Nineteen studies utilized deep learning (DL) convolutional neural networks for histopathological OED analysis, and 4 used machine learning (ML) models. Studies were summarized by AI method, main study outcomes, predictive value for malignant transformation, strengths, and limitations.

conclusionML/DL studies for OED grading and prediction of malignant transformation are emerging as promising adjunctive tools in the field of digital pathology. These adjunctive objective tools can ultimately aid the pathologist in more accurate diagnosis and prognosis prediction. However, further supportive studies that focus on generalization, explainable decisions, and prognosis prediction are needed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMouth NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsHumansMouth MucosaArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningOral dysplasiaPrecancerousPremalignant

Identifiers

PMID38727841
PMCPMC11087425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.