Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727782›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Anaplasmosis outbreaks in taurine and zebu cattle in Brazil: causes, treatments, and Anaplasma marginale genetic diversity.

Luccas Lourenzzo Lima Lins Leal, Alliny Souza de Assis Cavalcante, Igor Maciel Lopes de Moraes, Vanessa Salvador, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro Couto, Luciana Maffini Heller, Dina Maria Beltrán Zapa, Warley Vieira de Freitas Paula, Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva Sales, Eduardo Lima and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Does fluralaner (ExzoltParasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  6. First Record ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Luccas Lourenzzo Lima Lins LealCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Alliny Souza de Assis CavalcanteCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Igor Maciel Lopes de MoraesCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Vanessa SalvadorCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Luiz Fellipe Monteiro CoutoCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Luciana Maffini HellerCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Dina Maria Beltrán ZapaCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Warley Vieira de Freitas PaulaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva SalesAggeu Magalhães Institute, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Eduardo LimaItaberaí, Goiás, Brazil.
Alexandre Braga ScarpaScarpa Consultoria, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Ricardo Antônio Amaral de LemosFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Fernando de Almeida BorgesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
José ZambranoZambrano Consultoria, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lorena Lopes FerreiraDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Felipe da Silva KrawczakDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Filipe Dantas-TorresAggeu Magalhães Institute, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Welber Daniel Zanetti LopesCenter of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. wdzlopes@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-8436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate seven outbreaks of A. marginale infection in two regions of Brazil, affecting taurine, zebu, and crossbred cattle. We assessed the possible causes, treatment measures, and genetic diversity of A. marginale. These outbreaks occurred in two states (Goiás: outbreaks 1-7; Mato Grosso do Sul: outbreak 3), breeds (Holstein, Nellore, and crossbreed), age groups (beef cattle: 18-25 days old and 7-8 months; dairy cattle: 18-25 days old, 13-14 months, and cow after the first birth) and rearing systems (feedlot, pasture, pen in a wood shaving bedding system and compost bedded-pack barns). Metaphylactic or prophylactic treatments varied according to outbreak (imidocarb dipropionate: outbreaks 1-4 and 6; enrofloxacin: outbreaks 5 and 7; diminazene diaceturate: outbreak 5). In outbreaks 6 and 7, the packed cell volume was monitored. In all outbreaks, the practice of needle/syringe sharing was discontinued. For outbreaks 1-3, clinical signs and mortality (range, 4.8-13.3%) occurred 36-45 days after entry into the feedlot. In outbreak 4, A. marginale was diagnosed in 66.2% of the calves (bacteremia, 0-4.5%), with a mortality of 8.6%. Among nursing calves aged 60 days during outbreak 5, 53.8% were infected with A. marginale, with average bacteremia of 2.7% (range, 0-21.3%), and a mortality of 13.8%. In dairy heifers aged 14 months, raised in paddocks lacking vegetation cover and infested with R. microplus, then transitioned to a rotational grazing system also infested with R. microplus, the A. marginale bacteremia ranged from 3.2 to 6.7%, with a mortality of 20%. Before monitoring during outbreak 7, the mortality was 17.9%, but no further deaths were observed after monitoring initiation. In conclusion, possible causes triggering the outbreaks included primary tick infestation, needle/syringe sharing, and stress factors which may have affected the immunological statues of animals in the feedlots. Control measures performed in all outbreaks were effective. The partial msp4 gene sequences of A. marginale generated herein belonged to two haplotypes, but further research would be needed to investigate if this finding has any clinical significance.

Indexed as

Anaplasma marginaleAnaplasmosisCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksGenetic VariationAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBrazilCattleFemaleMaleAnaplasmosisCattle tick fevermsp4Rhipicephalus microplus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.