Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727768›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Impact of Left Renal Vein Ligation on Renal Function Following En Bloc Resection of Segmental Inferior Vena Cava and Right Kidney.

Shengzheng Wang, Pokhrel Gaurab, Jinshan Cui, Shuanbao Yu, Yafeng Fan, Zhaowei Zhu, Jin Tao, Xuepei Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic inferior vena cava segmental resection for renal tumor with tumor thrombus invading the vascular wall].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shengzheng Wang *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Pokhrel Gaurab *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jinshan CuiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuanbao YuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yafeng FanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhaowei ZhuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jin TaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuepei ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. zhangxuepei@263.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal function after left renal vein (LRV) ligation following en bloc resection of segmental inferior vena cava (IVC) and right kidney is understudied. We assessed the impact of LRV ligation on postoperative renal function following en bloc resection of segmental IVC and right kidney.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 28 patients who underwent LRV ligation during en bloc resection of segmental IVC and right kidney. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient survival were collected. Pre- and postoperative renal function was retrospectively analyzed.

resultsTwenty patients underwent robot-assisted surgery and eight patients underwent open surgery. The median operative time was 162 min and estimated blood loss was 350 mL. Ten patients had normal renal function and 12 patients had an initial increase in creatinine but improved gradually. Six patients developed acute renal failure; five patients gradually recovered in 5-32 days after temporary hemodialysis. Renal replacement therapy significantly correlated with maximal anterior-posterior diameter of the LRV (p = 0.001). Complications were observed in 11 cases, four of which were Clavien-Dindo grades I-II. Thirteen patients were alive with no recurrence, nine patients were alive with metastasis, and six cases died during the follow-up period.

conclusionsLRV ligation following en bloc resection of segmental IVC and right kidney is feasible, with no significant long-term impact on renal function. The maximum anterior-posterior diameter of the LRV is a reliable method for predicting renal replacement therapy in the absence of collateral circulation.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsRenal VeinsVena Cava, InferiorAdultAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsLigationMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsInferior vena cava thrombusLeft renal vein ligationRenal cell carcinomaRenal function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.