ArticleNeurology and therapy2024
Safety, Tolerability, and Outcomes of Tafamidis for the Treatment of Acquired Amyloid Neuropathy in Domino Liver Transplant Recipients.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of patisiran for the treatment of acquired amyloid polyneuropathy in domino liver transplant recipients.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAcquired amyloid neuropathy is an iatrogenic disease that appears years after a domino liver transplant. The objectives of our study are to analyze the efficacy and tolerability of tafamidis for the treatment of acquired amyloid neuropathy in domino liver transplant recipients. This post-authorization, prospective, longitudinal study included seven domino liver transplant recipients with acquired amyloid neuropathy who received treatment with tafamidis for 18 months.
methodsThe primary endpoints were the response rate, defined as those patients with an increase of < 2 points on the Neurological Impairment Score (NIS) from baseline, and the change in the NIS score from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the Quantitative Sensory Test, 10-m walk test, quality of life (Norfolk), and disability (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale). As safety parameters, the evidence of graft rejection, changes in immunosuppressive trough levels and changes in antiviral and allogeneic cellular immunity before and 12 months after tafamidis treatment were also assessed.
resultsSix patients (85.7%) had responded at 18-months. Compared to baseline, we observed non-statistically significant improvement in mean NIS score at 6 months (- 2.54 points, CI - 5.92 to 0.84), 12 months (- 3.25 points; CI - 6.63 to 0.13), and 18 months (- 2.35 points; CI - 5.74 to 1.02). Changes in the Quantitative Sensory Test, 10-m walk tests and the quality of life and disability questionnaires were not statistically significant. The use of tafamidis did not induce relevant side effects or drug interactions. Also, no acute rejections events nor changes in functional adaptive immunity were observed.
conclusionOur study supports the safety and tolerability of tafamidis for the treatment of acquired amyloid neuropathy in domino liver transplant recipients. Tafamidis shows promise as a useful treatment in the clinical management of these patients. Future randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up durations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.