Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727714›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Large-scale deorphanization of

Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra, Amanda Kieswetter, Alison G Cole, Liesbet Temmerman, Ulrich Technau, Gáspár Jékely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AnOpen biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Transcriptomics of theEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of biosciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Thiel *Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-3512
Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra *Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Amanda KieswetterAnimal Physiology & Neurobiology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alison G ColeDepartment of Neurosciences and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7515-7489
Liesbet TemmermanAnimal Physiology & Neurobiology, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ulrich TechnauDepartment of Neurosciences and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gáspár JékelyLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-9836

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W010305/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 10.35802/214337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) - the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides - but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone

Indexed as

NeuropeptidesPhylogenyReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSea AnemonesAnimalsSignal TransductionNeuropeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledClytia hemisphaericaevolutionary biologyExaiptasia pallidaGPCRHydra vulgarisNematostella vectensisneuropeptideneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID38727714
PMCPMC11087051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.