ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Keratoconus Progression Determined at the First Visit: A Deep Learning Approach With Fusion of Imaging and Numerical Clinical Data.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Maximum Keratometry Progression With Stratified Progression Criteria in Keratoconus Patients Using Machine Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Automated Triage for New Keratoconus Referrals Using Multimodal Deep Learning.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predicting Intraocular Collamer Lens Vault in Myopic Patients With Shallow Anterior Chamber Using FedEYE Platform and ChatGPT.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based keratoconus detection from Scheimpflug images.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence derived grading of mustard gas induced corneal injury and opacity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024Review
- The Association of a Single Nucleotide Variant inMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- A Neural Network for the Prediction of the Visual Acuity Gained from Vitrectomy and Peeling for Epiretinal Membrane.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Multiple clinical visits are necessary to determine progression of keratoconus before offering corneal cross-linking. The purpose of this study was to develop a neural network that can potentially predict progression during the initial visit using tomography images and other clinical risk factors. Methods: The neural network's development depended on data from 570 keratoconus eyes. During the initial visit, numerical risk factors and posterior elevation maps from Scheimpflug imaging were collected. Increase of steepest keratometry of 1 diopter during follow-up was used as the progression criterion. The data were partitioned into training, validation, and test sets. The first two were used for training, and the latter for performance statistics. The impact of individual risk factors and images was assessed using ablation studies and class activation maps. Results: The most accurate prediction of progression during the initial visit was obtained by using a combination of MobileNet and a multilayer perceptron with an accuracy of 0.83. Using numerical risk factors alone resulted in an accuracy of 0.82. The use of only images had an accuracy of 0.77. The most influential risk factors in the ablation study were age and posterior elevation. The greatest activation in the class activation maps was seen at the highest posterior elevation where there was significant deviation from the best fit sphere. Conclusions: The neural network has exhibited good performance in predicting potential future progression during the initial visit. Translational Relevance: The developed neural network could be of clinical significance for keratoconus patients by identifying individuals at risk of progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.