ArticleJournal of vision2024
Color constancy mechanisms in virtual reality environments.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color discrimination in action: High-throughput measurement in immersive VR.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Human-aligned evaluation of a pixel-wise DNN color constancy model.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Approaches to understanding natural behavior.Journal of vision · 2025Review
- VR HMD color calibration and accurate control of emitted light using Three.js.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Colour Calibration of a Head Mounted Display for Colour Vision Research Using Virtual Reality.SN computer science · 2022Article
- Human color constancy in cast shadows.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated high levels of color constancy in real-world scenarios featuring single light sources, extensive fields of view, and prolonged adaptation periods. However, exploring the specific cues humans rely on becomes challenging, if not unfeasible, with actual objects and lighting conditions. To circumvent these obstacles, we employed virtual reality technology to craft immersive, realistic settings that can be manipulated in real time. We designed forest and office scenes illuminated by five colors. Participants selected a test object most resembling a previously shown achromatic reference. To study color constancy mechanisms, we modified scenes to neutralize three contributors: local surround (placing a uniform-colored leaf under test objects), maximum flux (keeping the brightest object constant), and spatial mean (maintaining a neutral average light reflectance), employing two methods for the latter: changing object reflectances or introducing new elements. We found that color constancy was high in conditions with all cues present, aligning with past research. However, removing individual cues led to varied impacts on constancy. Local surrounds significantly reduced performance, especially under green illumination, showing strong interaction between greenish light and rose-colored contexts. In contrast, the maximum flux mechanism barely affected performance, challenging assumptions used in white balancing algorithms. The spatial mean experiment showed disparate effects: Adding objects slightly impacted performance, while changing reflectances nearly eliminated constancy, suggesting human color constancy relies more on scene interpretation than pixel-based calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.