ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2023
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The influence of gender norms on women's sexual and reproductive health outcomes: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Africa, the rights of adolescent girls and young women in terms of sexual and reproductive health are strongly influenced by social norms. This article delves into the pivotal role these norms play in the abortion decisions and experiences of young women aged 15-24 in Benin. An ethnographic approach was adopted for data collection among young women who have undergone abortion, their confidants, and other community members. The findings reveal that these young women face a threefold normative burden in their social environment. They juggle contradictory norms that simultaneously stigmatise early pregnancies, hinder proper sexual education, and strongly condemn abortion. These normative pressures often drive their resort to abortions, typically carried out under unsafe conditions. The study also highlights the significant role parents play in the abortion decisions and processes of teenagers under 20. When men are involved in seeking care for abortion, adolescents and young women usually access safer procedures. However, their access to aftercare and contraception following an abortion is hindered by the social norms of healthcare professionals. In addition to broadening the conditions of access to abortion in Benin in October 2021, it is imperative to implement interventions centred on value clarification, raising awareness of adolescents' rights, combating obstetric violence, and social stigmatisation. These measures are crucial to alleviate the weight of social norms bearing down on these young women. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2294793.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.