Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727566›Full record

ReviewRadiology. Imaging cancer2024

Revisiting the "Puffed Cheek" Technique: Advantages, Fallacies, and Potential Solutions.

Shehbaz Ansari, Surjith Vattoth, Eric R Basappa, Pokhraj Prakashchandra Suthar, Santhosh Gaddikeri, Miral D Jhaveri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. AJCC 8th Edition Staging of Oral Cavity Cancer: Radiologic Evaluation.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shehbaz AnsariFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0002-1319-6319
Surjith VattothFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0002-9846-7914
Eric R BasappaFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0002-6518-9639
Pokhraj Prakashchandra SutharFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0001-7909-123X
Santhosh GaddikeriFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0002-4226-5563
Miral D JhaveriFrom the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60661.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-0088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "puffed cheek" technique is routinely performed during CT neck studies in patients with suspected oral cavity cancers. The insufflation of air within the oral vestibule helps in the detection of small buccal mucosal lesions, with better delineation of lesion origin, depth, and extent of spread. The pitfalls associated with this technique are often underrecognized and poorly understood. They can mimic actual lesions, forfeiting the technique's primary purpose. This review provides an overview of the puffed cheek technique and its associated pitfalls. These pitfalls include pneumoparotid, soft palate elevation that resembles a nasopharyngeal mass, various tongue displacements or distortions that obscure tongue lesions or mimic them, sublingual gland herniation, an apparent exacerbation of the airway edema, vocal cord adduction that hinders glottic evaluation, and false indications of osteochondronecrosis in laryngeal cartilage. Most stem from a common underlying mechanism of unintentional Valsalva maneuver engaged in by the patient while trying to perform a puffed cheek, creating a closed air column under positive pressure with resultant surrounding soft-tissue displacement. These pitfalls can thus be avoided by instructing the patient to maintain continuous nasal breathing while puffing out their cheek during image acquisition, preventing the formation of the closed air column.

Indexed as

CheekTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansInsufflationMouth NeoplasmsCTHead/Neck

Identifiers

PMID38727566
PMCPMC11148836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.