Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727516›Full record

Trial reportPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2024

Associations of Patient and Parent Characteristics With Parental Decision Regret in the PICU: A Secondary Analysis of the 2015-2017 Navigate Randomized Comparative Trial.

Rachel C Ashworth, Jay R Malone, Dana Franklin, Lauren R Sorce, Marla L Clayman, Joel Frader, Douglas B White, Kelly N Michelson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02333396 (Improving Communication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Patients Facing Life-Changing Decisions), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02333396 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Patients Facing Life-Changing Decisions: The Navigate Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoRan2015 to 2017Enrolled442ConditionsCommunicationArmsPICU Supports, Educational Brochure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Japanese Version of the Quality of Dying and Death in the PICU Instrument: Development and Validation in Eight Centers in Japan.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment and Their Families in the PICU: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis to Assess Clinician-Family Collaboration and Mutuality.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel C AshworthDivision of Pediatric Critical Care and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Jay R MaloneDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Dana FranklinDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Lauren R SorceDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Marla L ClaymanCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA.
Joel FraderDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Douglas B WhiteProgram in Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kelly N MichelsonDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Funding

Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify self-reported meaningful decisions made by parents in the PICU and to determine patient and parent characteristics associated with the development of parental decision regret, a measurable, self-reported outcome associated with psychologic morbidity.

designSecondary analysis of the Navigate randomized comparative trial (NCT02333396).

settingTwo tertiary, academic PICUs. PATIENTS: Spanish- or English-speaking parents of PICU patients aged less than 18 years who were expected to remain in the PICU for greater than 24 hours from time of enrollment or who had a risk of mortality greater than 4% based on Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBetween April 2015 and March 2017, 233 parents of 209 patients completed a survey 3-5 weeks post-PICU discharge which included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), a 5-item, 5-point Likert scale tool scored from 0 (no regret) to 100 (maximum regret). Two hundred nine patient/parent dyads were analyzed. The decisions parents reported as most important were categorized as: procedure, respiratory support, medical management, parent-staff interactions and communication, symptom management, fluid/electrolytes/nutrition, and no decision. Fifty-one percent of parents had some decision regret (DRS > 0) with 19% scoring in the moderate-severe range (DRS 26-100). The mean DRS score was 12.7 ( sd 18.1). Multivariable analysis showed that parental Hispanic ethnicity was associated with greater odds ratio (OR 3.12 [95% CI, 1.36-7.13]; p = 0.007) of mild regret. Being parents of a patient with an increased PICU length of stay (LOS) or underlying respiratory disease was associated with greater odds of moderate-severe regret (OR 1.03 [95% CI, 1.009-1.049]; p = 0.004 and OR 2.91 [95% CI, 1.22-6.94]; p = 0.02, respectively).

conclusionsDecision regret was experienced by half of PICU parents in the 2015-2017 Navigate study. The characteristics associated with decision regret (parental ethnicity, PICU LOS, and respiratory disease) are easily identifiable. Further study is needed to understand what contributes to regret in this population and what interventions could provide support and minimize the development of regret.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsIntensive Care Units, PediatricParentsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID38727516
PMCPMC12230857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.