Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38727250›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024

Anion-Dependent Strength Scale of Interactions in Ionic Liquids from X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics, and Density Functional Theory.

Ekaterina Gousseva, Frances K Towers Tompkins, Jake M Seymour, Lewis G Parker, Coby J Clarke, Robert G Palgrave, Roger A Bennett, Ricardo Grau-Crespo, Kevin R J Lovelock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Element-Specific Donor Numbers for Anions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. dThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ekaterina GoussevaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.
Frances K Towers TompkinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.
Jake M SeymourDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.
Lewis G ParkerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-4116
Coby J ClarkeSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-3490
Robert G PalgraveDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-2486
Roger A BennettDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6266-3510
Ricardo Grau-CrespoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-1719
Kevin R J LovelockDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-269X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a combination of experiments and calculations, we have gained new insights into the nature of anion-cation interactions in ionic liquids (ILs). An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)-derived anion-dependent electrostatic interaction strength scale, determined using XPS core-level binding energies for IL cations, is presented here for 39 different anions, with at least 18 new anions included. Linear correlations of experimental XPS core-level binding energies for IL cations with (a) calculated core binding energies (ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations were used to generate high-quality model IL structures followed by single-point density functional theory (DFT) to obtain calculated core binding energies), (b) experimental XPS core-level binding energies for IL anions, and (c) other anion-dependent interaction strength scales led to three main conclusions. First, the effect of different anions on the cation can be related to ground-state interactions. Second, the variations of anion-dependent interactions with the identity of the anion are best rationalized in terms of electrostatic interactions and not occupied valence state/unoccupied valence state interactions or polarizability-driven interactions. Therefore, the XPS-derived anion-dependent interaction strength scale can be explained using a simple electrostatic model based on electrostatic site potentials. Third, anion-probe interactions, irrespective of the identity of the probe, are primarily electrostatic, meaning that our electrostatic interaction strength scale captures some inherent, intrinsic property of anions independent of the probe used to measure the interaction strength scale.

Identifiers

PMID38727250
PMCPMC11129296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.