ArticleBiochemistry2024
Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 Frameshift Stimulatory Element with an Upstream Multibranch Loop.
Article in Biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the Mechanism of Drug Binding to SARS-CoV-2 RNA Pseudoknot With Thermodynamics-Driven Machine Learning.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Open questions on viral frameshifting: Exploiting the structural plasticity of the frameshifting element for therapeutic intervention.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Covalent Probes Reveal Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Structured RNA and Enable Bioactive Compound Design.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- A Cascade of Conformational Switches in SARS-CoV-2 Frameshifting: Coregulation by Upstream and Downstream Elements.Biochemistry · 2025Article
- Biological Significance and Therapeutic Promise of Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) frameshift stimulatory element (FSE) is necessary for programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) and optimized viral efficacy. The FSE has an abundance of context-dependent alternate conformations, but two of the structures most crucial to -1 PRF are an attenuator hairpin and a three-stem H-type pseudoknot structure. A crystal structure of the pseudoknot alone features three RNA stems in a helically stacked linear structure, whereas a 6.9 Å cryo-EM structure including the upstream heptameric slippery site resulted in a bend between two stems. Our previous research alluded to an extended upstream multibranch loop that includes both the attenuator hairpin and the slippery site-a conformation not previously modeled. We aim to provide further context to the SARS-CoV-2 FSE via computational and medium resolution cryo-EM approaches, by presenting a 6.1 Å cryo-EM structure featuring a linear pseudoknot structure and a dynamic upstream multibranch loop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.