Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726982›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2024

Which radial head fractures are best treated surgically?

Anna E van der Windt, Lisette C Langenberg, Joost W Colaris, Denise Eygendaal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna E van der WindtDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6244-7946
Lisette C LangenbergDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost W ColarisDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise EygendaalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the common occurrence of radial head fractures, there is still a lack of consensus on which radial head fractures should be treated surgically. The radial head is an important secondary stabilizer in almost all directions. An insufficient radial head can lead to increased instability in varus-valgus and posterolateral rotatory directions, especially in a ligament-deficient elbow. The decision to perform surgery is often not dictated by the fracture pattern alone but also by the presence of associated injury. Comminution of the radial head and complete loss of cortical contact of at least one fracture fragment are associated with a high occurrence of associated injuries. Nondisplaced and minimally displaced radial head fractures can be treated non-operatively with early mobilization. Displacement (>2 mm) of fragments in radial head fractures without a mechanical block to pronation/supination is not a clear indication for surgery. Mechanical block to pronation/supination and comminution of the fracture are indications for surgery. The following paper reviews the current literature and provides state-of-the-art guidance on which radial head fractures should be treated surgically.

Indexed as

arthroplastyopen reduction internal fixationradial head excisionradial head fractures

Identifiers

PMID38726982
PMCPMC11099579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.