Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726968›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2026

The advantages and intraoperative management of the laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis.

Yildiray Daduk, Ahmet Seker, Alper Sozutek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yildiray DadukDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Health Sciences University, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Ahmet Seker
Alper Sozutek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGangrene/perforated appendicitis entails high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to discuss the reliability, surgical management and post-operative complications of laparoscopic interventions in the treatment of perforated appendicitis. PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred and ten patients (50 men and 60 women) diagnosed with perforated appendicitis based on history, physical examinations, laboratory and computed tomography findings between January 2016 and May 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Preoperative laboratory and radiological findings, surgical methods and post-operative complications were evaluated.

resultsAbdominal pain defence and rebound were present in all patients. In terms of radiological findings, intra-abdominal free fluid was present in all patients and abscess in 42. Post-operative abdominal surgical site infection developed in six patients. No intra-abdominal abscess or incisional hernia was observed during follow-ups.

conclusionAs a diagnostic tool, permitting better visualisation of the abdominal cavity, entailing fewer post-operative complications and obviating the need for large incisions, laparoscopy can represent the approach of choice in the treatment of perforated appendicitis.

Indexed as

Laparoscopic appendectomymanagementperforated appendicitispost-operative complications

Identifiers

PMID38726968
PMCPMC13493074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.