Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726918›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Ten-Year Outcome of Recanalization or Medical Therapy for Concomitant Chronic Total Occlusion After Myocardial Infarction.

Anna van Veelen, Casper F Coerkamp, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Truls Råmunddal, Dan Ioanes, Peep Laanmets, René J van der Schaaf, Erlend Eriksen, Matthijs Bax, Maarten Jan Suttorp and 13 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CTO PCI vs. medical therapy in stable CAD: real-world outcomes from a target trial emulation of SCAAR registry data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Anna van VeelenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-3261
Casper F CoerkampDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7237-9473
Yvemarie B O SomsenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-2585-9631
Truls RåmunddalDepartment of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-5962
Dan IoanesDepartment of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Peep LaanmetsDepartment of Cardiology North-Estonia Medical Center Tallinn Estonia.
René J van der SchaafDepartment of Cardiology OLVG Hospital Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Erlend EriksenDepartment of Cardiology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-8870
Matthijs BaxDepartment of Cardiology Haga Teaching Hospital The Hague the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2180-7009
Maarten Jan SuttorpDepartment of Cardiology St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein the Netherlands.
Bradley H StraussDepartment of Cardiology Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1139-2965
Emanuele BarbatoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-5178
Koen M MarquesDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-9147
Martijn MeuwissenDepartment of Cardiology Amphia Hospital Breda the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5421-5205
Olivier BertrandDepartment of Cardiology Quebec Heart-Lung Institute Quebec Canada.
Martin van der EntDepartment of Cardiology Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam the Netherlands.
Paul KnaapenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-7898
Jan G P TijssenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-2628
Bimmer E P M ClaessenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1703-7921
Loes P C HoebersDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-1447-7301
Joëlle EliasDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.
José P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8969-7929
EXPLORE investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EXPLORE (Evaluating Xience and Left Ventricular Function in PCI on Occlusions After STEMI) trial was the first and only randomized trial investigating chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) early after primary PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, compared with medical therapy for the CTO. We performed a 10-year follow-up of EXPLORE to investigate long-term safety and clinical impact of CTO PCI after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, compared with no-CTO PCI. METHODS AND

resultsIn EXPLORE, 302 patients post-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with concurrent CTO were randomized to CTO PCI within ≈1 week or no-CTO PCI. We performed an extended clinical follow-up for the primary end point of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of cardiovascular death, coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction. Secondary end points included all-cause death, angina, and dyspnea. Median follow-up was 10 years (interquartile range, 8-11 years). The primary end point occurred in 25% of patients with CTO PCI and in 24% of patients with no-CTO PCI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.70-1.76]). Cardiovascular mortality was higher in the CTO PCI group (HR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.10-2.50]), but all-cause death was similar (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.93-2.50]). Dyspnea relief was more frequent after CTO PCI (83% versus 65%,

conclusionsThis 10-year follow-up of patients post-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction randomized to CTO PCI or no-CTO PCI demonstrated no clinical benefit of CTO PCI in major adverse cardiac events or overall mortality. However, CTO PCI was associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality compared with no-CTO PCI. Our long-term data support a careful weighing of effective symptom relief against an elevated cardiovascular mortality risk in CTO PCI decisions. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.trialregister.nl; Unique identifier: NTR1108.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomechronic total occlusionclinical outcomepercutaneous coronary interventionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38726918
PMCPMC11179819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.