ArticleFEBS open bio2024
Comparative genome analysis of three classical E. coli cloning strains designed for blue/white selection: JM83, JM109 and XL1-Blue.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a lactose-complemented antibiotic-free host-vector platform for stable enzyme expression in Limosilactobacillus fermentum 217 - 82.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genetic Elements Associated with the Acquired Resistome of the Gut Microbiota in a Broiler Rooster Flock in Hungary.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Syntheses, DNA interactions, and photodynamic antimicrobial properties of near-infrared indolium carbocyanine dyes.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Staphylococcus aureus's golden-yellow pigment staphyloxanthin: production enhancement, analytical characterization, and biological attributes.Microbial cell factories · 2026Review
- Exploring the interactome of the Staphylococcus aureus sRNA Srn_9342 identified a complex formation with RNAIII leading to the modulation of δ-hemolysin expression.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Design of a ligand-dependent fluorescent biosensor, based on an engineered lipocalin (anticalin), for the sensitive detection of the Alzheimer β-amyloid peptide.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2025Article
- Protein purification with light via a genetically encoded azobenzene side chain.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of the Escherichia coli K-12 laboratory strains JM83, JM109 and XL1-Blue was instrumental in early gene technology. We report the comprehensive genome sequence analysis of JM83 and XL1-Blue using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies and a comparison with both the wild-type sequence (MG1655) and the genome of JM109 deposited at GenBank. Our investigation provides insight into the way how the genomic background that allows blue/white colony selection-by complementing a functionally inactive ω-fragment of β-galactosidase (LacZ) with its α-peptide encoded on the cloning vector-has been implemented independently in these three strains using classical bacterial genetics. In fact, their comparative analysis reveals recurrent motifs: (i) inactivation of the native enzyme via large deletions of chromosomal regions encompassing the lac locus, or a chemically induced frameshift deletion at the beginning of the lacZ cistron, and (ii) utilization of a defective prophage (ϕ80), or an F'-plasmid, to provide the lacZ∆M15 allele encoding its ω-fragment. While the genetic manipulations of the E. coli strains involved repeated use of mobile genetic elements as well as harsh chemical or physical mutagenesis, the individual modified traits appear remarkably stable as they can be found even in distantly related laboratory strains, beyond those investigated here. Our detailed characterization at the genome sequence level not only offers clues about the mechanisms of classical gene transduction and transposition but should also guide the future fine-tuning of E. coli strains for gene cloning and protein expression, including phage display techniques, utilizing advanced tools for site-specific genome engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.