Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726478›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2024

Stakeholders' perceptions of value of nature-based interventions in promoting health in people with stress-related illness: a qualitative study.

Gunilla Johansson, Jeaneth Johansson, Åsa Engström, Päivi Juuso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gunilla JohanssonDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1367-2247
Jeaneth JohanssonDivision of Business Administration and Industrial Engineering, Department of Social Science, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3377-6177
Åsa EngströmDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6244-6401
Päivi JuusoDivision of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7388-069X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress-related illness is a common and increasing cause for sick leave in Sweden. Spending time in nature reduces stress and promotes health and well-being. Accordingly, nature-based interventions (NBI) for people with stress-related illness have been developed and implemented in southern Scandinavia; however, such interventions are uncommon in the Circumpolar North. Previous studies have examined the effects and experiences of participating in NBI, but research about different stakeholders' perspectives on NBI is lacking. The aim of this study was to explore different key stakeholders' perceptions of the value of NBI in promoting health in people with stress-related illness. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 11 persons with stress-related illness experience, 14 healthcare professionals, and 11 entrepreneurs offering NBI. Qualitative content analysis resulted in four categories:

Indexed as

Health PromotionQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalAdultArctic RegionsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNatureSwedenHealth promotionnature-based interventionnursingqualitative studystakeholderstress-related illnessvalue

Identifiers

PMID38726478
PMCPMC11089910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.