Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Application of machine learning algorithms to identify people with low bone density.

Rongxuan Xu, Yongxing Chen, Zhihan Yao, Wei Wu, Jiaxue Cui, Ruiqi Wang, Yizhuo Diao, Chenxin Jin, Zhijun Hong, Xiaofeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging applications of feature selection in osteoporosis research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision support.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rongxuan XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yongxing ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhihan YaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jiaxue CuiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Ruiqi WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yizhuo DiaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Chenxin JinDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhijun HongThe Health Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is becoming more common worldwide, imposing a substantial burden on individuals and society. The onset of osteoporosis is subtle, early detection is challenging, and population-wide screening is infeasible. Thus, there is a need to develop a method to identify those at high risk for osteoporosis. Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm to effectively identify people with low bone density, using readily available demographic and blood biochemical data. Methods: Using NHANES 2017-2020 data, participants over 50 years old with complete femoral neck BMD data were selected. This cohort was randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Lasso regression selected variables for inclusion in six machine learning models built on the training data: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), naive Bayes (NB), artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF). NHANES data from the 2013-2014 cycle was used as an external validation set input into the models to verify their generalizability. Model discrimination was assessed via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and F1 score. Calibration curves evaluated goodness-of-fit. Decision curves determined clinical utility. The SHAP framework analyzed variable importance. Results: A total of 3,545 participants were included in the internal validation set of this study, of whom 1870 had normal bone density and 1,675 had low bone density Lasso regression selected 19 variables. In the test set, AUC was 0.785 (LR), 0.780 (SVM), 0.775 (GBM), 0.729 (NB), 0.771 (ANN), and 0.768 (RF). The LR model has the best discrimination and a better calibration curve fit, the best clinical net benefit for the decision curve, and it also reflects good predictive power in the external validation dataset The top variables in the LR model were: age, BMI, gender, creatine phosphokinase, total cholesterol and alkaline phosphatase. Conclusion: The machine learning model demonstrated effective classification of low BMD using blood biomarkers. This could aid clinical decision making for osteoporosis prevention and management.

Indexed as

Bone DensityMachine LearningOsteoporosisAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysSupport Vector Machineblood biochemical indicatorslow bone densitymachine learningNational Health and Nutrition Examination Surveyosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38726233
PMCPMC11080984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.