Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726197›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Impact of different decontamination methods on the reduction of spiromesifen residue in chilli fruits.

Ramgopal Dudwal, Bhanwar Lal Jakhar, Abdul Rashid Khan Pathan, Alka Kataria, Shish Ram Dhaka, Ishrat Jan, R Z Sayyed, Aarif Khan, Ling Shing Wong, Vinoth Kumarasamy and 3 more

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ramgopal DudwalSchool of Agriculture, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017, India.
Bhanwar Lal JakharSri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303329, India.
Abdul Rashid Khan PathanSri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303329, India.
Alka KatariaDepartment of Environmental Science, IIS (Deemed to be University), Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302020, India.
Shish Ram DhakaSri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303329, India.
Ishrat JanResearch Centre for Residue and Quality Analysis, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Srinagar, 190025, India.
R Z SayyedDepartment of Microbiology, PSGVP Mandal's S I Patil Arts, G B Patel Science and STKV Sangh Commerce College, Shahada, 425409, India.
Aarif KhanDepartment of Environmental Science, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, 305817, India.
Ling Shing WongFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia.
Vinoth KumarasamyDepartment of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, 56000, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Gaurav GuptaCentre for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India.
Vetriselvan SubramaniyanDepartment of Pharmacology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine & Health Sciences, MONASH University, Malaysia.
Naveed A MalikDivision of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Science, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, 190025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chilli is an indispensable food item in the daily life of humans but it is affected by many insects, so various pesticides, including spiromesifen, are applied to chilli crops to protect this crop from insect infestation. However, the use of pesticides poses environmental and health issues. These issues have raised the demand for pesticide-free chillies among consumers. The primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of various decontamination methods in removing spiromesifen residues from chilli fruits. A randomized block design was employed to conduct a supervised field experiment at the Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute in Durgapura, Jaipur, India. The samples of chillies treated with pesticides are subjected to seven different homemade techniques. The samples were extracted using the QuEChERS method, known for its efficiency, affordability, simplicity, robustness, and safety. The analysis of spiromesifen residues was conducted using gas chromatography (GC) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD), and the results were verified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Out of several decontamination methods, the lukewarm water treatment was more effective than any other decontamination method, which led to the highest elimination of spiromesifen residue, whereas rinsing with tap water eliminates the least amount of spiromesifen residue. So, the lukewarm water treatment is a safe, cost-effective, and eco-friendly approach to remove spiromesifen residues from Chilli.

Indexed as

ChilliDecontamination methodsPesticideSpiromesifen residues

Identifiers

PMID38726197
PMCPMC11078876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.