Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726190›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Water quality assessment methods of the highland Andean rivers: A scoping systematic review.

Carlos Matovelle, María Quinteros, Karen Sofía Quinteros, Karla Jaramillo

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos MatovelleUniversidad Católica de Cuenca, HYDROLAB, Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología (CIITT), Ecuador.
María QuinterosUniversidad Católica de Cuenca, HYDROLAB, Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología (CIITT), Ecuador.
Karen Sofía QuinterosUniversidad Católica de Cuenca, HYDROLAB, Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología (CIITT), Ecuador.
Karla JaramilloUniversidad Católica de Cuenca, HYDROLAB, Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología (CIITT), Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water is a resource that influences sustainable development in different ways in social, economic, and environmental aspects, being the Andes the major provider of this resource. However, they have been affected mainly by anthropogenic activities due to the proximity of settlements in the watersheds, so they tend to have more significant contamination, and their evaluation is essential to mitigate problems for those who consume them. However, despite being a fundamental resource and one of the main contributors of water, it is not so studied, so the present study aims to determine the studies based on the water quality of the high mountain rivers of the Andes by using a PRISMA methodology with the scoping review extension, based on search techniques, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and monitoring tables, in order to maintain a line of research attached to the objective of the study. After using the methodology, ten articles were obtained, which were analyzed after a bibliometric analysis to determine features of interest, such as countries in which the studies were carried out, years of publication, methodologies used, and authors' consensus. High Andean rivers' importance, the need for more studies within these areas, and the lack of suitable indexes for these unique ecosystems are highlighted.

Indexed as

Andean riversHigh mountainScoping reviewWater quality

Identifiers

PMID38726190
PMCPMC11079317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.