Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726132›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimizing green supply chain circular economy in smart cities with integrated machine learning technology.

Tao Liu, Xin Guan, Zeyu Wang, Tianqiao Qin, Rui Sun, Yadong Wang

RetractedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2025-07-12Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao LiuSchool of Journalism and Communication, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xin GuanGuangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan, 523133, China.
Zeyu WangSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Tianqiao QinSchool of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Rui SunSchool of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yadong WangSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores methodologies to enhance the integration of a green supply chain circular economy within smart cities by incorporating machine learning technology. To refine the precision and effectiveness of the prediction model, the gravitational algorithm is introduced to optimize parameter selection in the support vector machine model. A nationwide prediction model for green supply chain economic development efficiency is meticulously constructed by leveraging public economic, environmental, and demographic data. A comprehensive empirical analysis follows, revealing a noteworthy reduction in mean squared error and root mean squared error with increasing iterations, reaching a minimum of 0.007 and 0.103, respectively-figures that are the lowest among all considered machine learning models. Moreover, the mean absolute percentage error value is remarkably low at 0.0923. The data illustrate a gradual decline in average prediction error and standard deviation throughout the model optimization process, indicative of both model convergence and heightened prediction accuracy. These results underscore the significant potential of machine learning technology in optimizing supply chain and circular economy management. The paper provides valuable insights for decision-makers and researchers navigating the landscape of sustainable development.

Indexed as

Circular economyEfficiency improvementGreen supply chainMachine learningSmart city

Identifiers

PMID38726132
PMCPMC11078764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.