ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Optimizing the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Lessons Learned from 110 Consecutive Flaps.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computed Tomographic Angiography-guided Zero-COPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMCF) in autologous breast reconstruction has been superseded by abdominal free tissue transfer. Common complaints of the LDMCF include the asymmetric back scar, need for prosthesis, and high seroma rates. We believe that the LDMCF remains versatile, with distinct advantages over other autologous options: the flap can be harvested unilaterally or bilaterally, not 'burning any bridges' for future reconstruction in unilateral breast reconstruction; the recovery is relatively easy, without complications such as risk of long-term abdominal wall weakness; and the aesthetic results are comparable, if not superior, leading to a more "youthful" result. Methods: We performed a retrospective review over an 8-year period. Results: A total of 106 patients underwent 110 breast reconstructions. Complications included four of 106 patients (3.8%) with seroma, three of 78 (3.8%) with periprosthetic implant infection, and one case of partial flap loss. Conclusions: We learned the following: (1) Direct-to-implant can be performed in most LDMCF patients, avoiding the use of tissue expanders; (2) High BMI patients may not require an implant; (3) Back donor site aesthetics can be improved using a "bra-line-back-lift" approach; (4) Use of liposomal bupivacaine intercostal blocks and modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol can reduce length-of-stay to overnight; (5) We achieved low seroma rates using topical fibrin glue and closed suction drains; (6) Low and high BMI patients who may not qualify for free tissue transfer are usually still surgical candidates with LDMCF; and (7) Short and long-term recovery are faster than free tissue transfer, with minimal long-term deficit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.