Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38726037›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2024

Segmentation and Volume Estimation of the Habenula Using Deep Learning in Patients With Depression.

Yusuke Kyuragi, Naoya Oishi, Momoko Hatakoshi, Jinichi Hirano, Takamasa Noda, Yujiro Yoshihara, Yuri Ito, Hiroyuki Igarashi, Jun Miyata, Kento Takahashi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precise antibody delivery to the brain via nanobubble-actuated focused ultrasound alleviates depression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yusuke KyuragiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoya OishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Momoko HatakoshiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jinichi HiranoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takamasa NodaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yujiro YoshiharaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuri ItoDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki IgarashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun MiyataDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kento TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei KamiyaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Junya MatsumotoDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohisa OkadaHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasutaka FushimiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuyuki NakagomeNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya MuraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Taro SuwaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The habenula is involved in the pathophysiology of depression. However, its small structure limits the accuracy of segmentation methods, and the findings regarding its volume have been inconsistent. This study aimed to create a highly accurate habenula segmentation model using deep learning, test its generalizability to clinical magnetic resonance imaging, and examine differences between healthy participants and patients with depression. Methods: This multicenter study included 382 participants (patients with depression: Results: A Dice coefficient of 86.6% was achieved in the derivation cohort. The test-retest dataset showed a mean absolute percentage error of 6.66, indicating sufficiently high reproducibility. A Dice coefficient of >80% was achieved for datasets with different imaging conditions, such as magnetic field strengths, spatial resolutions, and imaging sequences, by adjusting the threshold. A significant negative correlation with age was observed in the general population, and this correlation was more pronounced in patients with depression ( Conclusions: Habenula volume could be a pathophysiologically relevant factor and diagnostic and therapeutic marker for depression, particularly in women.

Indexed as

Deep learningDepressionHabenulaImage analysisSex differencesStructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID38726037
PMCPMC11078767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.