ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Perturbing cortical networks:
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping global brain reconfigurations following local targeted manipulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Charting the path in rodent functional neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chemogenetic techniques, specifically the use of Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs), have become invaluable tools in neuroscience research. Yet, the understanding of how Gq- and Gicoupled DREADDs alter local field potential (LFP) oscillations in vivo remains incomplete. Methods: This study investigates the in vivo electrophysiological effects of DREADD actuation by deschloroclozapine, on spontaneous firing rate and LFP oscillations recorded from the anterior cingulate cortex in lightly anesthetized male rats. Results: Unexpectedly, in response to the administration of deschloroclozapine, we observed inhibitory effects with pan-neuronal hM3D(Gq) stimulation, and excitatory effects with pan-neuronal hM4D(Gi) stimulation in a significant portion of neurons. These results emphasize the need to account for indirect perturbation effects at the local neuronal network level in vivo, particularly when not all neurons express the chemogenetic receptors uniformly. In the current study, for instance, the majority of cells that were transduced with both hM3D(Gq) and hM4D(Gi) were GABAergic. Moreover, we found that panneuronal cortical chemogenetic modulation can profoundly alter oscillatory neuronal activity, presenting a potential research tool or therapeutic strategy in several neuropsychiatric models and diseases. Discussion: These findings help to optimize the use of chemogenetic techniques in neuroscience research and open new possibilities for novel therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.