ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Neonatal outcomes in preterm infants with severe congenital heart disease: a national cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term medical support after definitive surgery for esophageal atresia: analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Predicting the future for neonates with symptomatic congenital heart disease.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Advances in interdisciplinary care for term and preterm neonates with congenital heart disease: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Seizures in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease: A National Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- The critical role of diagnostic accuracy in differentiating uterine dehiscence and placenta accreta spectrum to enhance neonatal outcomes in complex cesarean sections.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of congenital heart disease and prematurity on brain injury from a national registry.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and trends based on a joinpoint regression model of preterm birth with congenital heart disease in Changsha City, China, from 2011 to 2023.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Hybrid approach: a prospective option for treating congenital heart defects in pediatric patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prematurity and congenital heart disease (CHD) are the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Limited data are available about the outcomes of premature infants with severe CHD. Methods: We queried The National Inpatient Database using ICD-10 codes for premature patients (<37 weeks) with severe CHD from 2016 to 2020. Severe CHDs were grouped into three categories: A. left-sided lesions with impaired systemic output, B. Cyanotic CHD, and C. Shunt lesions with pulmonary overcirculation. Patients with isolated atrial or ventricular septal defects and patent ductus arteriosus were excluded. We also excluded patients with chromosomal abnormalities and major congenital anomalies. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated by comparing premature infants with vs. without CHD adjusting for gestational age (GA), birth weight, and gender. Results: A total of 27710 (1.5%) out of 1,798,245 premature infants had severe CHD. This included 27%, 58%, and 15% in groups A, B, and C respectively. The incidence of severe CHD was highest between 25 and 28 weeks of gestation and decreased significantly with increasing GA up to 36 weeks ( Conclusion: Premature infants with severe CHD are at high risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Morbidity remains increased across all GA groups and in all CHD categories. This significant risk of adverse outcomes is important to acknowledge when managing this patient population and when counseling their families. Future research is needed to examine the impact of specific rather than categorized congenital heart defects on neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.