Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725898›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Perioperative and functional outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Descriptive analysis of Indian study group on partial nephrectomy database.

Sudhir Rawal, Arvind Ganpule, Gurpremjit Singh, Nikita Shrivastava, T A Kishore, Deepak Dubey, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Anant Kumar, Gagan Gautam, Ginil Kumar Pooleri and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sudhir RawalDepartment of Genito Uro-Oncology Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India.
Arvind GanpuleDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Gurpremjit SinghDepartment of Uro-Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Nikita ShrivastavaDepartment of Urology, DKS Super Speciality Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
T A KishoreDepartment of Urology, Aster Medicity, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Deepak DubeyDepartment of Urology, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Ravimohan S MavuduruDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anant KumarDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Max Hospitals, Delhi, India.
Gagan GautamDepartment of Uro-Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India.
Ginil Kumar PooleriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Mohan KeshavamurthyDepartment of Urology, Fortis Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Narasimhan RagavanDepartment of Urology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Hemang BaxiDepartment of Urology, HCG Cancer Center, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sanjai Kumar AddlaDepartment of Uro Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
S Krishnappa RaghunathDepartment of Uro Oncology and Robotic Surgery, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Akhil DahiyaDepartment of Clinical and Medical Affairs, Intuitive Surgical, California, USA.
Divya GuptaCatalyst Clinical Services, Delhi, India.
Gopal SharmaDepartment of Urology, Medanta, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN. Methods: For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers. Results: In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.

Identifiers

PMID38725898
PMCPMC11078450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.