Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38725894›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Clinical study of steroid receptors in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: A domain worth revisiting.

Aditya Prakash Sharma, Puranjay Pratap Singh, Rohit Chauhan, Ipsita Panda, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Girdhar S Bora, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Mavuduru, Nandita Kakkar, Santosh Kumar, Uttam Mete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Authors reply Re: Sharma AP, Singh PP, Chauhan R, Panda I, Devana SK, Bora GS,Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  2. Re: Sharma AP, Singh PP, Chauhan R, Panda I, Devana SK, Bora GS,Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aditya Prakash SharmaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Puranjay Pratap SinghDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rohit ChauhanDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ipsita PandaDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sudheer Kumar DevanaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Girdhar S BoraDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ravimohan Suryanarayan MavuduruDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nandita KakkarDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Uttam MeteDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prognostic significance of steroid receptors in bladder cancer remains controversial. This study was designed to determine the expression status of androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptors (ERα and Erβ), and its potential role in predicting survival in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods: Sixty patients of NMIBC were screened and 57 (41 males and 16 females) were included in our study. The tissue microarray slides were evaluated by pathologists blinded to the clinical information. Association of distribution of steroid receptors with stage, grade, progression, and recurrence was seen. Results: The mean age of the population was 60.9 ± 9.3 years. Pathologically, majority of the patients were Ta (Ta: T1 stage 61.4% vs. 38.6%). Nine (15.8%) of the tumors stained positive for AR while one (1.8%) tumor stained positive for ERα and 36 (63.2%) tumors stained for ERβ. A higher proportion of male NMIBC stained positive for AR (19.5% vs. 6.2%, Conclusion: AR and ERβ positivity is found in NMIBC patients while ERα shows minimal staining in NMIBC patients. Although it did not reach a statistical significance, a higher proportion of AR-negative and ERβ-positive tumors recurred as compared to AR-positive and ERβ-negative patients. PFS was significantly lower in ERβ-negative group. Further exploratory studies on larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings in NMIBC patients.

Identifiers

PMID38725894
PMCPMC11078449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.