ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validation of King's Health Questionnaire in the Marathi language.
Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of the Hungarian version of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in women.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Outcome measurement is a crucial component of contemporary professional practice. Many Indian rehabilitation facilities employ the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), but there has never been an official Marathi translation with its reliability and validity. Materials and Methods: As per the recommendations for cross-cultural validation of an outcome assessment, KHQ was translated into the Marathi language at a tertiary hospital in Pune, India. A study was conducted to assess the dependability of 123 patients from tertiary hospitals in India. The reliability of the study was assessed by two competent physiotherapists. The interrater reliability of the KHQ total scores and each item was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To compare the interrater dependability with the findings of other investigations, the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient was determined. Results: When evaluated by domain, the KHQ's standardized Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.49-0.92. All domains had reliability that was rated as moderate to strong by ICC, and the severity rating scale varied from 0.53 to 0.81. The Pearson correlation coefficient between KHQ and short form-36 (SF-36) in the majority of related areas was found to be weak to moderate, with values ranging from -0.27 to -0.53. Conclusions: The Marathi version of the KHQ was translated and adapted for use in Marathi language-speaking Indian women with urinary incontinence complaints. It represents an important instrument for the evaluation of incontinent women in clinical research with good interrater reliability and validity with SF-36 quality-of-life measure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.