ArticleCureus2024
Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Ultrasound Findings in 87 Patients With Finger Drop.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe inability to extend the fingers at the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints leads to finger drop. While wrist drop and foot drop are well recognized, the causes of finger drop are poorly understood.
aimsThis study describes the clinical, electrodiagnostic (EDX), and ultrasound (US) features in patients with finger drop. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study of 87 patients presenting with finger drop and referred for EDX studies during the past 10 years. We analyzed the clinical picture, EDX data, and US findings. The patients were categorized into global (all five digits) or partial (limited to 1-4 digits) finger drop.
resultsFifty-six (64%) patients had global finger drop, while 31 (36%) had partial finger drop. The frequent cause of finger drop was Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS) (29 [33%]), followed by trauma (23 [26%]), cervical radiculopathy (16 [18%]), extensor tendon rupture (four [4%]), and compression/entrapment (two [2%]). In 13 (15%) patients, no cause was identified. A total of 13/16 (81%) patients with cervical radiculopathy and four of the patients with tendon rupture had partial finger drop, while 52/64 (81%) with posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) neuropathy had global finger drop. Of the 16 patients who experienced cervical radiculopathy as the cause of the finger drop, 15 patients had C7 and C8 radiculopathy and one patient had C7 radiculopathy. EDX studies of patients with PTS revealed partial axon loss in 18 (62%) patients, conduction block in eight (28%), and total axon loss in four (14%). Enlarged fascicles were observed by US in 40% of patients with PTS. EDX studies of patients who sustained iatrogenic nerve injury causing finger drop demonstrated total axon loss in six (46%) patients, partial axon loss in four (31%), demyelination in two (15%), and conduction block in two (15%).
conclusionsPIN neuropathy is the most common cause of finger drop, however, lesser-known causes such as cervical radiculopathy and extensor tendon rupture should also be considered. Global finger drop is suggestive of PIN neuropathy, while partial finger drop occurs more often in cervical radiculopathy and tendon rupture. EDX and US studies provide valuable information for localizing the lesion site and may reveal the cause of the finger drop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.